Friday, 20 March 2015

Bible version --???

Bible Version ---? For English readers, so many Bible ‘versions’ available – which is best? I will not answer that but will say please make no serious decision quickly, nor on the basis of a couple of words in any one version.


For English speaking people the historically most important Bible was that produced under James of Scotland, king of Great Britain 1603-1625. The story of how that King James Version Bible became unexpectedly dominant for centuries need not delay me here. In the 1800s it was a point of contention in the Colony of NSW that children must be taught that ‘Bible’ in Government schools. As recently as the 1950s it is hard to imagine any Australian English speaking background household not having its ‘Bible’, a cultural artefact of the day. I would say the book was a cult item with an established place; it could be used to ‘swear’ on in court. It could press flowers. It could contain the family history [births, deaths, marriages]. Not to say the pages were read all that much. Our KJV Bibles were many and the Bible’s notional cultural status a given. I think it fair to say the KJV had become an annex to English as a language. Those days are past.



That 1611 ‘King James Version’ [KJV] is still available in print and on the internet and is treasured by very many I think. [The KJV is also available in a mildly revised version.] However, in view of advances in textual studies and the changes in common language, by 1881 many scholars supported publication of a thoroughly revised translation. Since then many versions have followed.


Some people did not, and many do not, agree!

Separately, I posted copyright details of the versions I am using.