Such incredible news at the time. Is it now less so?
Independent. No 'catches'. No 'strings'. No money. Explore about Jesus for yourself. Some content in 'Pages' - links under 'Home'. Nor is anything secret - just send me (Allen Hampton) a personal email if you have an enquiry (jesus.saviour4unme@gmail.com). I will reply direct to you. Allen Hampton - see "About". Questions may go in comments.
Showing posts with label crucified. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crucified. Show all posts
Sunday, 20 April 2025
Monday, 17 June 2024
Jesus & that Fellow Jew from Tarsus
The man from Tarsus may well have walked (?) that road
Apart from Jesus himself, the most prominent person we know about in the spreading of the message of Jesus was Paul. (He was originally introduced as the Jew, “Saul of Tarsus”). He presents as formerly furiously antagonistic, miraculously changed into a representative of Jesus. (Below I am thinking about Paul’s “CV” - I do not plan to make this exhaustive.)
Saul first enters the Acts record here, as a participant in the Jerusalem death of Stephen, a Jesus-follower:
Tuesday, 4 April 2023
Jesus: All four say..
The four Gospels devote a considerable amount of space to Jesus’ final week, and the resurrection day. Following is a compilation extracted from information limited to that found in all of the accounts.
Monday, 16 January 2023
Jesus: Lifted Up (v.2)
Jesus: "lifted up"
I wonder how the original hearers reacted when they heard Jesus say this:
Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him (John 3:14-15, CEV).
Friday, 15 April 2022
Jesus: Crucified
Pilate was surprised to hear that he was already dead. Summoning the centurion, he asked him if Jesus had already died (Mark 15:44, NIV).
Thursday, 16 December 2021
Sunday, 31 March 2019
Messiah Crucified
Below is a partial compilation of Jesus and the cross. This is a glimpse of how the Gospel writers reported the reality of his death.
Saturday, 15 April 2017
Risen - ? - !
In John’s account following the execution of Jesus on the Roman cross we read:
Early on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb. It was still dark. She saw that the stone had been moved away from the entrance. So she ran to Simon Peter and another disciple, the one Jesus loved. She said, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb! We don’t know where they have put him!”
Mary (and others - “we”) saw an emptied tomb. (There was more to the story of the women. For example, John goes on to recount that this Mary was the first to speak with the risen Jesus.)
Early on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene went to the tomb. It was still dark. She saw that the stone had been moved away from the entrance. So she ran to Simon Peter and another disciple, the one Jesus loved. She said, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb! We don’t know where they have put him!”
Mary (and others - “we”) saw an emptied tomb. (There was more to the story of the women. For example, John goes on to recount that this Mary was the first to speak with the risen Jesus.)
Thursday, 9 April 2015
Executed under Pontius Pilate v2
Edited
The accounts are unambiguous: Jesus of Nazareth was executed by crucifixion under the authority of Pontius Pilate.Friday, 3 April 2015
A Saviour who Saves Others
Sadly, today, and so tragically frequently, the pages of human history are indelibly stained by brutal and aggressive behaviour,
Wednesday, 1 April 2015
Crucified under Pontius Pilate! (3)
The accounts are unambiguous: Jesus of Nazareth was executed by crucifixion under the authority of Pontius Pilate.
Rome, the imperial power, routinely used crucifixion as an exemplary punishment for the condemned. That empire did not invent crucifixion, nor was it normally used for their citizens. Many were crucified, with little or no note made of the victims. An example: In 72 BCE (or, BC) the Roman Marcus Licinius Crassus had 6,000 survivors of a slave revolt crucified along the Italian roadside. No procedure would be recorded, nor the names of those summarily punished - they had offended Rome by deserting from their slavery and taking up arms against their masters. They had only the one entitlement. (britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/141893/Marcus-Licinius-Crassus)
The Jerusalem Jewish establishment had found Jesus guilty of 'blasphemy' and thus worthy of death under the Law of the LORD (as interpreted by them). However, they wanted sentence carried out by their Roman authority. It is frequently written that at the time the 'Jews' could not impose capital punishment, even given Roman respect for indigenous law. However, in contrast to the assertion of limited power, I note that in Jerusalem, not long after the death of Jesus, a man named Stephen was stoned to death for blasphemy! That was during the same Roman domination. Moreover, not all that much later there were attempts to execute Paul, in the presence of Romans, by assassination.
An inconsistency? Why then might the Jewish powers use Pilate to eliminate Jesus via a political charge? I conjecture that the establishment figures had their purpose clear. Jesus had followers and had enjoyed a measure of public acclaim (especially amongst the poorer sort). The leaders would have an eye on the 'mob' and possibly they had the desire to 'keep their hands clean' anyway, as they observed a time great religious solemnity for the LORD. Watching Jesus' execution by heathen Romans would be preferred, and safer.
Rome, the imperial power, routinely used crucifixion as an exemplary punishment for the condemned. That empire did not invent crucifixion, nor was it normally used for their citizens. Many were crucified, with little or no note made of the victims. An example: In 72 BCE (or, BC) the Roman Marcus Licinius Crassus had 6,000 survivors of a slave revolt crucified along the Italian roadside. No procedure would be recorded, nor the names of those summarily punished - they had offended Rome by deserting from their slavery and taking up arms against their masters. They had only the one entitlement. (britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/141893/Marcus-Licinius-Crassus)
The Jerusalem Jewish establishment had found Jesus guilty of 'blasphemy' and thus worthy of death under the Law of the LORD (as interpreted by them). However, they wanted sentence carried out by their Roman authority. It is frequently written that at the time the 'Jews' could not impose capital punishment, even given Roman respect for indigenous law. However, in contrast to the assertion of limited power, I note that in Jerusalem, not long after the death of Jesus, a man named Stephen was stoned to death for blasphemy! That was during the same Roman domination. Moreover, not all that much later there were attempts to execute Paul, in the presence of Romans, by assassination.
An inconsistency? Why then might the Jewish powers use Pilate to eliminate Jesus via a political charge? I conjecture that the establishment figures had their purpose clear. Jesus had followers and had enjoyed a measure of public acclaim (especially amongst the poorer sort). The leaders would have an eye on the 'mob' and possibly they had the desire to 'keep their hands clean' anyway, as they observed a time great religious solemnity for the LORD. Watching Jesus' execution by heathen Romans would be preferred, and safer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



